On-Farm Impacts of Soybean Silage in an Annual Rotation with Corn Silage

Project Overview

FNE99-274
Project Type: Farmer
Funds awarded in 1999: $7,200.00
Projected End Date: 12/31/1999
Matching Non-Federal Funds: $9,073.00
Region: Northeast
State: Vermont
Project Leader:

Commodities

  • Agronomic: corn, soybeans
  • Animal Products: dairy

Practices

  • Animal Production: feed formulation, feed rations
  • Crop Production: intercropping, nutrient cycling
  • Education and Training: demonstration, display, on-farm/ranch research, participatory research
  • Farm Business Management: whole farm planning, budgets/cost and returns, agricultural finance
  • Pest Management: field monitoring/scouting
  • Production Systems: integrated crop and livestock systems
  • Soil Management: soil analysis, organic matter

    Proposal summary:

    There is a tremendous interest on dairy farms in Vermont and other New England states in producing soybeans for silage to be harvested with corn silage to enhance crude protein and energy in mixed silage being fed to dairy cows. Especially, since we now have soybean varieties that can produce 4 ton of dry matter per acre and crude protein levels of 24.5% and net energy lactation in megacals/lb of 65 on a dry matter basis. I want to also look at the impact of soybeans in our annual crop rotation with corn. I want to evaluate reduction in nitrogen applied which impacts ground water, economic viability and field operating efficiency. I have a 15 acre field that we want to plant in strips of two rows of corn and two rows of soybeans. These will be harvested for silage, stored and fed after fermentation to our dairy herd as a major part of their ration. This should improve our feed quality and reduce our feeding costs or increase our gross sales for high protein milk. We will be planting both crops at the same time and harvesting both at the same time. This should reduce our field operating costs through better efficiency.

    Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or SARE.